Difference between revisions of "User talk:CSGuy"

Latest revision as of 01:34, January 15, 2011

Thanks

Thanks for the comment on the name. :-) I like your outlook (most articles on Conservapedia are horribly narrow-minded and Conservo-centric). I've tried to make some minor edits to combat this (i.e., changing the first line in the article "God" from "God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist" to "In most monotheistic religions (and in particular the three Judeo-Christian religions), God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist"). I feel like a lot of people here are a bit blunt though (especially the serious arguments that people have about whether or not people should make a cure for homosexuality). Overall it's both funny and frustrating to see things like that, but I think I'm content creating and editing more secular pages (right now I'm obsessing over pages involving New York City). -Ilikecake 21:02, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Please don't insert ideological "fact" tags. Instead, look for the reference that you think is necessary. It's often not hard to find. Thanks.--Aschlafly 23:52, 14 November 2008 (EST)

Unclude

If there was an unclude what would you like it to mean? :-)AlanE 20:17, 15 November 2008 (EST)

It's vs. its - this is NOT hard!

Tell me about it. Beginning to think it might be worth creating a page to fully explain how apostraphes work with it's and its.--Ieuan 16:02, 17 November 2008 (EST)

Star Trek 2009

Did you see the movie as well? I thought it was one of the greatest movies I've ever seen. --JY23 11:41, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

I did, and I agree. -CSGuy 20:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

2011

Welcome back. --Joaquín Martínez 20:34, 14 January 2011 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Template US_amendments==
+== Thanks ==
-I edited this template so that the image doesn't appear on the same level as the title. Is this what you were requesting be fixed for proper display in Opera? It's nice to meet a fellow Opera user! -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 19:53, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
+Thanks for the comment on the name. :-) I like your outlook (most articles on Conservapedia are horribly narrow-minded and Conservo-centric). I've tried to make some minor edits to combat this (i.e., changing the first line in the article "God" from "God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist" to "In most monotheistic religions (and in particular the three Judeo-Christian religions), God is the sovereign creator and eternal ruler of all things and beings that exist"). I feel like a lot of people here are a bit blunt though (especially the serious arguments that people have about whether or not people should make a cure for homosexuality). Overall it's both funny and frustrating to see things like that, but I think I'm content creating and editing more secular pages (right now I'm obsessing over pages involving New York City). -[[User:Ilikecake|Ilikecake]] 21:02, 14 November 2008 (EST)
-:It wasn't, actually.  For me, at least, in Opera the list of amendments is one column.  In Firefox, it appears as two.  (Oddly, it appears as one in IE.)  Maybe it's just that Firefox displays it differently.  The only consequence of your edit I see is in Firefox; the image moved from the right side to between the text columns. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:20, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
-:It must just be a difference in the rendering engines; Firefox using the IE Tab extension displays the same way IE does. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 21:23, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
-::Weird. I had no idea it rendered as two columns in other browsers. The only line of code I can see suggesting this is <nowiki><div style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;"></nowiki>, which I don't really understand but would completely explain why the two columns appear only in Mozilla/Firefox. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 12:43, 8 August 2008 (EDT)
-== Warning of blocking ==
+Please don't insert ideological "fact" tags.  Instead, look for the reference that you think is necessary.  It's often not hard to find.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:52, 14 November 2008 (EST)
-Don't reinsert bad grammar after it is fixed by someone else.  See [[professor values]] (plural).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:42, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
+==Unclude==
-:Then don't revert the whole edit; just fix the problem. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 15:51, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
+If there was an ''unclude'' what would you like it to mean? :-)[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 20:17, 15 November 2008 (EST)
-:: No, you need to fix your own grammar and certainly do not ever reinsert it after it has been reverted.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:13, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
-== Don't revert legitimate edits ==
+==It's vs. its - this is NOT hard!==
-Please don't revert legitimate edits without first discussing it in the talk page, you may be atheist, but you have to accept that your liberal bias heavily influences your "views"--[[User:Skain|Skain]] 20:09, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
+Tell me about it.  Beginning to think it might be worth creating a page to fully explain how apostraphes work with ''it's'' and ''its''.--[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 16:02, 17 November 2008 (EST)
+==Star Trek 2009==
+Did you see the movie as well? I thought it was one of the greatest movies I've ever seen. --[[User:JY23|JY23]] 11:41, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
+:I did, and I agree. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 20:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
+== 2011 ==
+Welcome back. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:34, 14 January 2011 (EST)