Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Proposed Dispute Resolution Process"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Page moved to discussion)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==Original Discussion from Aschlafly's Talk Page==
 
−
<div style="width: 70%; margin: 0 15% 1em 15%; background-color: #DEE6ED; padding: 0.5em; border: solid 1px #6699CC;">
 
−
==Dispute Resolution Procedure==
 
  
−
I think the best way to handle disputes and choose a logo is for me to step aside and allow a panel of the students who helped found this site decide these matters.  None of these individuals are related to me and I have disagreed with some of them in the past.  They don't have any ax to grind.  They deserve a key role in deciding direction here.
 
−
 
−
They will first pick a logo, taking into the account the recent revelation that the defacing of the leading choice may have been by the designer himself.  Next they will resolve the dispute over [[The Theory of Evolution]] page.  I don't know what or how they will decide but I am confident that this is the most fair way to resolve this.  I agree beforehand to abide by their decision and trust everyone else here will also.  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:36, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
*I think that sounds like an excellent plan. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 22:40, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
**Seems like the Arbitration committee. I hope that each party involved will be able to state their arguments and opinions, and citations they wish to use, etc. Also, will the homeschoolers who founded the site be able to make decisions based on the Commandments, rather than their own personal biases? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:42, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
::: Sure, they'll be as unbiased as anyone.  Perhaps a separate page should be set up for arguments.  Feel free to move stuff from this page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:01, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
==Discussion==
 
−
===Support===
 
−
 
−
No comment here is good news. 
 
−
 
−
Really, these decisions are best left to the students.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:12, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
'''Support.''' I'm tired of all the wrangling over the Evolution page, and some sort of binding arbitration is necessary when even sysops don't agree. Hopefully we can all put aside our differences and agree to go with what the students say. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 00:14, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:'''Response:'''Not necessarily opposed to the idea itself (it can be reworked), but regardless of what we know the students to be (hard-working, dedicated, etc.) having a bunch of high-school age editors making vital decisions instantly obliterates any credibility we may have had amongst non-Conservapedians. As editors, SYSOPS, and Bureaucrats, they are awesome. Since we want to draw more people in (this ''is'' meant to be a truthful, accurate encyclopedia), this is not a good thing to be doing (that is, destroying credibility). Just my $0.02, feel free to comment. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:16, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
===Oppose===
 
−
 
−
==Alternative Suggestions==
 

Latest revision as of 04:27, March 23, 2007

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Proposed_Dispute_Resolution_Process&oldid=59061"