Difference between revisions of "Talk:Integral"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Qwestor (Talk) to last version by Mathoreilly) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT) | This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I am going to make some serious changes to this page. The definition of the Riemann integral does not even make sense as it is written. I'll post something in a few days. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:52, December 18, 2009
This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--Mathoreilly 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
- I am going to make some serious changes to this page. The definition of the Riemann integral does not even make sense as it is written. I'll post something in a few days.