Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Panel"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(...and redirecting)
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
That hardly sounds like a panel of objective experts...[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 16:22, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
+
#REDIRECT [[User talk:CPanel]]
−
 
 
−
:Is it supposed to be?  --[[User:Huey gunna getcha|Huey gunna getcha]] 16:24, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I have SERIOUS issues with the "anonymous members" bit. Members in this position should HAVE to be marked as such. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:29, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::OOO, OOO, can I be a member? I'll be ever so good! I promise I won't let my high school studies, lack of life experience or religious brain washing get in the way of making good fair decisions! Pwetty Please? [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
It has already been set up as anonymous and it is unlikely to change. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 16:34, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:So, a few anonymous Panel members could push their own point of view, and once it gets pushed back towards whatever passes as "neutrality" here, the Panel members could declare that this is a major conflict and should be handled... by the Panel. And nobody would of the conflict of interest. How convenient! --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:45, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:: how do we know a panel even exists! This looks serious bent, like a banana republic wiki!  --[[User:Cgday|Cgday]] 18:12, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:::Sunlight is the best disinfectant. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 18:19, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
"We do not censor in any way"
 
−
 
 
−
It is a shame that many of your editors do not agree with that policy, see http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Soccer&diff=56791&oldid=48604 for one incidence of very silly deletion. If you ''truly'' did not censor you would not keep closing the facility to create accounts.
 
−
:Well, to be fair, we are not allowed to copy from Wikipedia because (1) we do not follow the GFDL and (2) Andy made it a rule.
 
−
:However, there is censoring going on. Look at Conservative's edits that removed entire sections (with cites) simply because he didn't want his little propaganda piece to be cluttered with silly things like science. Or heck, look at some of the locked articles and their histories in general. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:02, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::How do we know that these panel members are up to date on the "major conflicts" they recieve?  Do they actively edit here and follow the ongoing debates?  What's to stop them from becoming another [[user:conservative]] or [[user:scorpion]]?  And they should definitely '''not''' be anonymous.  It's easy to hide behind anonymimity (sp, too lazy to look it up for real), but it takes a real man (or woman) to stand up and declare "I did it."
 

Latest revision as of 14:54, April 16, 2007

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Panel&oldid=110846"