Difference between revisions of "User talk:WLink"
(→90/10: new section) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Don't remove factual information from [[Theory of Relativity]]. Your [[censorship]] has been reverted.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | Don't remove factual information from [[Theory of Relativity]]. Your [[censorship]] has been reverted.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| − | None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. | + | None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. Further, the fact that information cannot travel faster than light is a conclusion, not an assumption, of relativity. |
| − | I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | + | I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? |
| + | --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 90/10 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't have the authority to block for 90/10, so I've lifted the block I gave you, but be aware that that is a blockable offense here. Stop arguing about something which have very clearly been argued to death, and write new articles or improve existing ones. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 16:11, 29 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:11, November 29, 2009
Don't remove factual information from Theory of Relativity. Your censorship has been reverted.--Andy Schlafly 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. Further, the fact that information cannot travel faster than light is a conclusion, not an assumption, of relativity.
I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? --WLink 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
90/10
I don't have the authority to block for 90/10, so I've lifted the block I gave you, but be aware that that is a blockable offense here. Stop arguing about something which have very clearly been argued to death, and write new articles or improve existing ones. JacobB 16:11, 29 November 2009 (EST)