Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gilbert Stuart"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(justification for removal of painting from Stuart's page)
 
(reply to Joaquin)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I am removing the painting of Martha Washington. While it was ''based'' on a head-and-shoulders painting by Stuart, this portrait was actually painted by Eliphalet Frazer Andrews in 1878. [http://www.upi.com/News_Photos/view/6f2abc7c0d6cab0b254fb712d398b7b7/Portrait-of-Martha-Washington-in-the-East-Room-of-White-House-in-Washington/]
 
I am removing the painting of Martha Washington. While it was ''based'' on a head-and-shoulders painting by Stuart, this portrait was actually painted by Eliphalet Frazer Andrews in 1878. [http://www.upi.com/News_Photos/view/6f2abc7c0d6cab0b254fb712d398b7b7/Portrait-of-Martha-Washington-in-the-East-Room-of-White-House-in-Washington/]
 +
:''Based'' on a Gilbert Stuart painting does not make it a Gilbert Stuart painting.  You are absolutely correct.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:10, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Since it is in part a copy, it is an original Stuart work and must be credited. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 18:35, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Credited, yes, but I don't believe it belongs on Stuart's page. It would be better to include the original instead. See [http://www.gilbert-stuart.org/Martha-Washington-(The-Athenaeum-Portrait).html here]. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 22:42, 8 August 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 02:42, August 9, 2011

I am removing the painting of Martha Washington. While it was based on a head-and-shoulders painting by Stuart, this portrait was actually painted by Eliphalet Frazer Andrews in 1878. [1]

Based on a Gilbert Stuart painting does not make it a Gilbert Stuart painting. You are absolutely correct. Karajou 13:10, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
Since it is in part a copy, it is an original Stuart work and must be credited. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
Credited, yes, but I don't believe it belongs on Stuart's page. It would be better to include the original instead. See here. --SharonW 22:42, 8 August 2011 (EDT)