Difference between revisions of "User talk:SeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wikipedia)
(Wasting our time: new section)
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi there.
+
<br>
 +
<center><b align="center" style="width: 70%; background:#000;color:#eee;border: 4px gold solid; font-size: 50px;">RETIRED</b><br><br><br></center>
  
[[User talk: SeanS/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
+
== Relly retired ==
  
=Machismo Article=
+
Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)
I am sorry about that but you should have a look at this article then: [[pride]]. --[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:34, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
:I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)
:I know what it is and I know what the Sins are, but they aren't biblical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:35, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
::Ok. Are you saying that I should have named the category Machismo and Christianity instead ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:38, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
:::No, its fine. I was removing the 7 deadly sins thing simply because those arent biblical, they are sins, but not "seven deadly"--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:40, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
::::I'm sorry but I'm confused. What do you mean ? Is it wrong to say that those are biblical or to say that there are deadly ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:44, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
:::::The sins are biblical. but calling them the seven deadly sins isnt. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
::::::Alright, thanks for the update.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 23:00, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
  
== Earthquakes ==
+
== Kenneth Williams ==
  
Can you have a look at the Earthquake article and the discussion about it on the main talk page? There is a claim that severe earthquakes are doubling every 40 years, which just isn't true. DavidZa and I have both demonstrated that the cited source is incorrect, but nobody seems interested and all attempts to fix the error just get instantly reverted. Here is a link to the actual data so that the reference can be checked: [http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/form?t=101650&s=1&d=1]. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 14:24, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
+
Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --[[User:Hetgar|Hetgar]] 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
  
== Wikipedia ==
+
== Block of Danielarmunrud ==
  
Sean, we don't copy from Wikipedia. Was your edit comment what you meant to say a few minutes ago?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:05, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
+
Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or [http://www.ameriwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Ameriwiki]; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote ''Lieberull Valyoos.'' --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)
:Well, i didn't have anything to put into the article, so i took the basic info about the name, who they are and birth date. better then a blank article at least.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 13:22, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
+
:Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
::Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::I could ban you for that... but eh. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Wasting our time ==
 +
 
 +
If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 
 +
== Wasting our time ==
 +
 
 +
If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 00:52, November 29, 2011


RETIRED


Relly retired

Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--James Wilson 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--SeanS 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

Kenneth Williams

Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --Hetgar 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)

Block of Danielarmunrud

Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or Ameriwiki; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote Lieberull Valyoos. --SamTC 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --SeanS 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --SamTC 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
I could ban you for that... but eh. --SeanS 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --SamTC 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Now that is just stalking :P--SeanS 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Wasting our time

If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. ~ JonG ~ 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)

Wasting our time

If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. ~ JonG ~ 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)