Difference between revisions of "User talk:SeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎First edit?: new section)
(→‎Wasting our time: new section)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<big>HELLO! :D</big>
+
<br>
 +
<center><b align="center" style="width: 70%; background:#000;color:#eee;border: 4px gold solid; font-size: 50px;">RETIRED</b><br><br><br></center>
  
−
[[User talk: SeanS/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
+
== Relly retired ==
  
−
=Machismo Article=
+
Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)
−
I am sorry about that but you should have a look at this article then: [[pride]]. --[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:34, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
:I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)
−
:I know what it is and I know what the Sins are, but they aren't biblical. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:35, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
−
::Ok. Are you saying that I should have named the category Machismo and Christianity instead ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:38, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
−
:::No, its fine. I was removing the 7 deadly sins thing simply because those arent biblical, they are sins, but not "seven deadly"--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:40, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
−
::::I'm sorry but I'm confused. What do you mean ? Is it wrong to say that those are biblical or to say that there are deadly ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:44, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
−
:::::The sins are biblical. but calling them the seven deadly sins isnt. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
−
::::::Alright, thanks for the update.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 23:00, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
+
  
−
== Earthquakes ==
+
== Kenneth Williams ==
  
−
Can you have a look at the Earthquake article and the discussion about it on the main talk page? There is a claim that severe earthquakes are doubling every 40 years, which just isn't true. DavidZa and I have both demonstrated that the cited source is incorrect, but nobody seems interested and all attempts to fix the error just get instantly reverted. Here is a link to the actual data so that the reference can be checked: [http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/form?t=101650&s=1&d=1]. --[[User:FindlayT|FindlayT]] 14:24, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
+
Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --[[User:Hetgar|Hetgar]] 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
  
−
== Wikipedia ==
+
== Block of Danielarmunrud ==
  
−
Sean, we don't copy from Wikipedia. Was your edit comment what you meant to say a few minutes ago?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:05, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
+
Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or [http://www.ameriwiki.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Ameriwiki]; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote ''Lieberull Valyoos.'' --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)
−
:Well, i didn't have anything to put into the article, so i took the basic info about the name, who they are and birth date. better then a blank article at least.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 13:22, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
+
:Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
::Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::I could ban you for that... but eh. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
  
−
::The vast internet has better sources than Wikipedia.  I'll take a look at the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:34, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
+
== Wasting our time ==
−
:::Probably, but i figured I could trust the information I used. Better then the unrelated vandalism it was created as.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 13:35, 25 September 2011 (EDT)
+
  
−
== Accusation ==
+
If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)
  
−
In your edit comment reverting my last change to the election article you insinuated that I am a parodist. This is neither true nor in the spirit of a wiki. I simply reverted an edit made to an article Mr. Schlafly has expressed his contentment with. My personal views are not really in play here (they happen to differ from Mr. Schlafly's on the election), and I am most certainly not a parodist. Out of curiosity, what is your definition of a parodist? [[User:GeraldA|GeraldA]] 19:04, 26 September 2011 (EDT)
+
== Wasting our time ==
−
:People who come here, making a account and suddenly getting involved in debates they should have no knowledge about, people who say "long time listener, first time caller", amongst other more obvious things. You act like a parodist because your doing the second, if you aren't, I apologize, but you put suspicion on yourself by doing the edit you did.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 19:06, 26 September 2011 (EDT)
+
  
−
== PJ O'Rourke ==
+
If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)
−
 
+
−
Sorry, I kinda made a mess of creating that page. Thanks for your help. --[[User:LeonardS|LeonardS]] 19:58, 26 September 2011 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Hi there ==
+
−
 
+
−
Just checking. You are otherwise known as Mikalos209 right?  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:40, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
+
−
:yah? why.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 19:41, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
+
−
::No reason.  Only just worked it out.  I'm not the cleverest cat.  Carry on.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:44, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== First edit? ==
+
−
 
+
−
Actually it wasn't my first edit: I was continuing a discussion I was having yesterday, before some clown blocked me for being a sock of someone I've never heard of. --[[User:BernhardtC|BernhardtC]] 09:13, 5 October 2011 (EDT)
+

Latest revision as of 00:52, November 29, 2011


RETIRED


Relly retired

Are you really retired? It means you don't edit, you know. If you're not, you might consider removing the templates.--James Wilson 16:05, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

I'm vaguely retired in that i dont plan to make any actual namespace edits at this point--SeanS 16:11, 29 October 2011 (EDT)

Kenneth Williams

Why is the death of Kenneth Williams attributed to Hollywood values? --Hetgar 17:49, 3 November 2011 (EDT)

Block of Danielarmunrud

Why are you doing this? I mean, so what if he copied from WP. It's not like this place is WP or Ameriwiki; nobody cares as long as he doesn't promote Lieberull Valyoos. --SamTC 21:44, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Rules say no WP, and he choose articles that dont even meet they're requirements. --SeanS 21:46, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Like I said, who cares? CP is just a hate blog these days, and as long as he's padding the edit count Schlafly's happy. --SamTC 21:48, 9 November 2011 (EST)
I could ban you for that... but eh. --SeanS 21:51, 9 November 2011 (EST)
You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --SamTC 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Now that is just stalking :P--SeanS 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)

Wasting our time

If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. ~ JonG ~ 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)

Wasting our time

If you're retired, then stay retired. Block, unblock, block, unblock, ad infinitum. It really gets annoying. ~ JonG ~ 19:52, 28 November 2011 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SeanS&oldid=941391"