Difference between revisions of "User talk:PaulRP"
DamianJohn (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "I notice that you have made 10 edits and they have all been talk talk talk talk. I suggest you consider making some substantive contributions or it'll be curtains. --~~~~") |
(sheesh, belligerent much?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I notice that you have made 10 edits and they have all been talk talk talk talk. I suggest you consider making some substantive contributions or it'll be curtains. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:41, 9 August 2012 (EDT) | I notice that you have made 10 edits and they have all been talk talk talk talk. I suggest you consider making some substantive contributions or it'll be curtains. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 21:41, 9 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | ==In other news...== | ||
| + | {{welcome}} | ||
| + | Feel free to ignore my colleague's rather belligerent comments. While substantive contributions are encouraged, on a general basis, unless gross misuses of the talk function are found, the 90/10 rule is not enforced.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 22:06, 9 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:06, August 10, 2012
I notice that you have made 10 edits and they have all been talk talk talk talk. I suggest you consider making some substantive contributions or it'll be curtains. --DamianJohn 21:41, 9 August 2012 (EDT)
In other news...
Welcome!
Hello, PaulRP, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, PaulRP!
Feel free to ignore my colleague's rather belligerent comments. While substantive contributions are encouraged, on a general basis, unless gross misuses of the talk function are found, the 90/10 rule is not enforced.brenden 22:06, 9 August 2012 (EDT)
