Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 121: Line 121:     
:: I'm not saying that litigation is the answer.  At this point, I'm only asking for honest reporting of the news.  Why won't the police tell us what was on the killer's hard drive????--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:58, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:: I'm not saying that litigation is the answer.  At this point, I'm only asking for honest reporting of the news.  Why won't the police tell us what was on the killer's hard drive????--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:58, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
I'm not asking for litigation either.  I'm just saying, no-one would believe a causal link except push-button activists looking for a new "issue."  Specifically, a judge wouldn't believe a link, nor would a jury.  They don't report it because it's irrelevant!  Do they report, "suspect had eaten an enchilada two days before - repeat, eaten an enchilada"?  No, because it ''doesn't matter''!-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 21:59, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==Is this a Joke?==
 
==Is this a Joke?==
2,732

edits

Navigation menu