21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: + + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 18:52, March 5, 2007
, 18:52, March 5, 2007no edit summary
Evolution is a scientific theory because it seeks to explain life using physical, testable properties. You can use the same properties to devise an alternate theory, and if yours is better than evolution, then you can be sure evolution won't be around very much longer.
Evolution is a scientific theory because it seeks to explain life using physical, testable properties. You can use the same properties to devise an alternate theory, and if yours is better than evolution, then you can be sure evolution won't be around very much longer.
==='''why not?'''===
I feel that Creationism/Intelligent design should be allowed in schools. Not replacing evolution in the cirriculum, but as an option for students to lean about, just as some schools(mainly Christian ones) have world religions & other related classes as a choice. I'm not a religious person, I'm actually agnostic, but I feel that if one wants to learn creationism/intelligent design in school, they should ba allowed to have that choice without necessarily having to go to a Christian school.