Changes

I'd like to make a couple of comments here. Fact: All the matter, energy, space and time of ''this'' universe began at it's original Creation. As far as '''''this''''' universe goes, there is absolutely no naturalistic explanation for causation beyond the origin of this universe--simple logic reasoning. Any attempt to do so is by it's very nature inherently a '''super'''-natural (metaphysical) appeal.  Therefore (I'm assuming it's acceptable here in discussions to make personal assertions, again correct me if I'm wrong...) let's have no further statements proclaiming 'infinite regressions' beyond the definite '''''finite''''' temporal bounds of this universe.  It certainly '''is''' logically ''a priori'' impossible.

I'd like to make a couple of comments here. Fact: All the matter, energy, space and time of ''this'' universe began at it's original Creation. As far as '''''this''''' universe goes, there is absolutely no naturalistic explanation for causation beyond the origin of this universe--simple logic reasoning. Any attempt to do so is by it's very nature inherently a '''super'''-natural (metaphysical) appeal.  Therefore (I'm assuming it's acceptable here in discussions to make personal assertions, again correct me if I'm wrong...) let's have no further statements proclaiming 'infinite regressions' beyond the definite '''''finite''''' temporal bounds of this universe.  It certainly '''is''' logically ''a priori'' impossible.

On the question of life:  The origin of life (not any subsequent changes thereto, just the simple origin problem alone) poses an insurmountable problem to materialist origin of life researchers.  There is not the slightest possibility of any stochastic mechanism alone providing satisfactory explanation for the incredible sequence of events required to form even the simplest of living cells (particularly amidst the seriously hostile conditions which are known to exist here on earth at physical life's beginning) during the known-to-be finite timespan (and everyother-span) of this universe.

On the question of life:  The origin of life (not any subsequent changes thereto, just the simple origin problem alone) poses an insurmountable problem to materialist origin of life researchers.  There is not the slightest possibility of any stochastic mechanism alone providing satisfactory explanation for the incredible sequence of events required to form even the simplest of living cells (particularly amidst the seriously hostile conditions which were known to exist here on earth at physical life's beginning) during the known-to-be finite timespan (and everyother-span) of this universe.

On fallacies:  The preeminent fallacy committed by typical science researchers today is the idea of methodological-naturalism, I.E., You can make no appeal to any causation beyond the boundaries of observable nature.  That is implicitly a biased point-of-view, and is a fundamentally flawed agenda if the actual goal is the pursuit of truth no matter where it leads--ostensibly the sovereign goal of science research itself (I know, I know...I'm probably just a naive idealist  :^).  All other current reasoning errors in science and philosophy research stem from this basic issue.

On fallacies:  The preeminent fallacy committed by typical science researchers today is the idea of methodological-naturalism, I.E., You can make no appeal to any causation beyond the boundaries of observable nature.  That is implicitly a biased point-of-view, and is a fundamentally flawed agenda if the actual goal is the pursuit of truth no matter where it leads--ostensibly the sovereign goal of science research itself (I know, I know...I'm probably just a naive idealist  :^).  All other current reasoning errors in science and philosophy research stem from this basic issue.