Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,703
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay: Communist China’s quixotic quest to innovate: A statist economy can’t make creativity greatly blossom (view source)
Revision as of 04:17, August 27, 2025
, 04:17, August 27, 2025→China Healthcare Breakthroughs: Ending Diseases and Challenging Big Pharma
:More [[stupidity]]: The argument that the "[[United States]]" received 17.3% of the profits from high tech is [[Communist]] - I didn't see a dime of it. Do the oligarchs and [[shareholder]]s who made all that money live in the US? Do they pay taxes to the [[US government]] (unlike your [[communist]] hero [[Bill Browder]])?
:More [[stupidity]]: The argument that the "[[United States]]" received 17.3% of the profits from high tech is [[Communist]] - I didn't see a dime of it. Do the oligarchs and [[shareholder]]s who made all that money live in the US? Do they pay taxes to the [[US government]] (unlike your [[communist]] hero [[Bill Browder]])?
::[https://chatgpt.com/share/68ae8161-0658-800a-af3d-5f6203ddbbd7 Can there be one cure for cancer or do the many types of cancer likely require there to be multiple cures so all the types of cancer are cured?]: "That’s a great question. The short answer is: It’s very unlikely that there will ever be one single universal cure for all cancers, because cancer is not one disease—it’s a large family of diseases with very different causes, behaviors, and vulnerabilities."
::[https://chatgpt.com/share/68ae8161-0658-800a-af3d-5f6203ddbbd7 Can there be one cure for cancer or do the many types of cancer likely require there to be multiple cures so all the types of cancer are cured?]: "That’s a great question. The short answer is: It’s very unlikely that there will ever be one single universal cure for all cancers, because cancer is not one disease—it’s a large family of diseases with very different causes, behaviors, and vulnerabilities."
:::You seem to put the profit motive over humanitarian aspects of cancer victims and their families. It figures.
::Next you wrote: "You could have participated in discussion of some of the vital issues of the time. But you excluded yourself." And then you ranted via talking about shutting up and going on spurious personal attacks. The bottom line is that you do not engage in discussions.
::Next you wrote: "You could have participated in discussion of some of the vital issues of the time. But you excluded yourself." And then you ranted via talking about shutting up and going on spurious personal attacks. The bottom line is that you do not engage in discussions.
:::You did, with your racist rants and screeds over the past several years, when the subject here is the hypothetical question: ''"If [[China]] cracks the code first, it won’t just be a [[medical]] milestone. It will mark a [[geopolitical]] shift—a [[Soft power|soft-power]] [[coup]] that challenges global narratives about [[leadership]], [[innovation]], and [[moral|moral authority]]."'' [https://archive.is/M4MgM] We already know where you stand with your [[bigoted]] views. Big mistake, showing your hand first for all the world to see.
::I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:54, August 26, 2025 (EDT)
::I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:54, August 26, 2025 (EDT)
:::I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 00:17, August 27, 2025 (EDT)