Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,741
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay: Communist China’s quixotic quest to innovate: A statist economy can’t make creativity greatly blossom (view source)
Revision as of 02:33, October 3, 2025
, 02:33, October 3, 2025→USA vs. China: And the winner in creativity is the USA!: new section
::So go ahead, keep posting you [[narcissistic]] [[claptrap]] about yourself from [[AI]], or what you think is "analysis" that makes you look "[[intelligent]]". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:39, September 30, 2025 (EDT)
::So go ahead, keep posting you [[narcissistic]] [[claptrap]] about yourself from [[AI]], or what you think is "analysis" that makes you look "[[intelligent]]". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 21:39, September 30, 2025 (EDT)
== USA vs. China: And the winner in creativity is the USA! ==
*[https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA%3D%3D_08cd203d-e12c-4c27-b389-483a2191bb04 Compared to the United States, per capita does creativity greatly blossom in China?]: "Based on available data and analysis, the United States likely produces more [[per capita]] [[creativity]] than China, particularly in individualistic and disruptive domains. The U.S. benefits from a culture of free expression, diverse population, and strong ecosystems for [[innovation]] (e.g., Silicon Valley, Hollywood), reflected in metrics like patents per capita (0.14 per 1,000 people in 2023) and Nobel Prize wins (~1.2 per million)."
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:33, October 2, 2025 (EDT)