21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Debate:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim "there is no objective truth" also not an objective truth? (view source)
Revision as of 07:42, July 25, 2007
, 07:42, July 25, 2007no edit summary
So there must exist some objective truth? [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 10:39, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
So there must exist some objective truth? [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 10:39, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
or it could be that "there is no objective truth" is a fact and not a truth. there is a difference between the two.
:That is the ultimate failing point of postmodernist thinking. In philosophical terms, they say that each person has their own narrative (story), but any push of a meta narrative (overarching life story... eg. The Biblical God created the world and hs a plan for each of us) is viewed as oppressive. Of course then they become the oppressors because their meta narrative is that there should be no meta narrative :-). --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 10:45, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
:That is the ultimate failing point of postmodernist thinking. In philosophical terms, they say that each person has their own narrative (story), but any push of a meta narrative (overarching life story... eg. The Biblical God created the world and hs a plan for each of us) is viewed as oppressive. Of course then they become the oppressors because their meta narrative is that there should be no meta narrative :-). --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 10:45, 31 March 2007 (EDT)