Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
1,130
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 11:
Line 11: − +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools (view source)
Revision as of 23:06, October 4, 2007
, 23:06, October 4, 2007no edit summary
[[Creationisim]] says there is indirect scientific proof for a Biblical begining to the universe. I think it is a main point of view because there are scientists who believe it and they observe, experiment; they have even better evidence than the evolutionists.
[[Creationisim]] says there is indirect scientific proof for a Biblical begining to the universe. I think it is a main point of view because there are scientists who believe it and they observe, experiment; they have even better evidence than the evolutionists.
Of course, no science: Creation, Evolution, or otherwise, can ''prove ''%100, anything about the orign of the universe. Scientific infallability only comes with direct observation. -[[User:StevenM]]
Of course, no science: Creation, Evolution, or otherwise, can ''prove ''%100, anything about the origin of the universe. Scientific infallability only comes with direct observation. -[[User:StevenM]]
== No, not in public schools ==
== No, not in public schools ==