1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 2:
Line 2: + +
Debate:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals? (view source)
Revision as of 17:21, July 1, 2008
, 17:21, July 1, 2008no edit summary
I disagree. I see several articles about people who never existed, but sound like they might have. Case in point, all the Spanish profanity on the Cambodia page that sat there for over a month until I decided to let everyone in on the joke. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
I disagree. I see several articles about people who never existed, but sound like they might have. Case in point, all the Spanish profanity on the Cambodia page that sat there for over a month until I decided to let everyone in on the joke. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:36, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
I think there's a lemma to Clarke's Law which says that "Any sufficiently fervently held belief is indistinguishable from satire".
:how does Wikipedia do it?[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 13:39, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
:how does Wikipedia do it?[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 13:39, 17 April 2007 (EDT)