6,068
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: − +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 15:28, April 2, 2007
, 15:28, April 2, 2007→'''Misconceptions'''
:::Actually you are incorrect. A phenomenon is something that can be seen, literally. What you observe when something falls is not gravity but the effect of gravity on an object. There is a difference. Gravity is a scientific theory.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 09:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Actually you are incorrect. A phenomenon is something that can be seen, literally. What you observe when something falls is not gravity but the effect of gravity on an object. There is a difference. Gravity is a scientific theory.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 09:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Actully the fall is the phenomenon called gravity. The theory that seeks to explain the cause of the fall is a theory '''OF''' gravity. [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 11:28, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Actully the fall is the phenomenon called gravity. The theory that seeks to explain the cause of the fall is a theory '''OF''' gravity. There is no single theory of gravity, there are many different theories of gravity. [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 11:28, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
==='''no...'''===
==='''no...'''===