Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 43: Line 43:     
:See, I think MountainDew's point here is very legitimate.  It goes to my whole feelings on "creation science."  If you believe creationism, but admit that it's just on faith, that's cool.  Just when YECs push creationism into science, or the public sphere, and outside of the realm of private faith... that gets me angry.  And you wouldn't like me when I'm angry.  But personal faith is unassailable, because it's just that - personal.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:01, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:See, I think MountainDew's point here is very legitimate.  It goes to my whole feelings on "creation science."  If you believe creationism, but admit that it's just on faith, that's cool.  Just when YECs push creationism into science, or the public sphere, and outside of the realm of private faith... that gets me angry.  And you wouldn't like me when I'm angry.  But personal faith is unassailable, because it's just that - personal.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:01, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::That's a fair point of disagreement.  I'm still of the philosophy that if something makes sense - you can intelligently explain it.  If it doesn't make sense, you shouldn't believe it.  --[[User:Rustyjd07|Rustyjd07]] 23:02, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
47

edits

Navigation menu