Difference between revisions of "Score capturing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (recat, bold) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→top: clean up) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time '''score capturing''' system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [http://smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_IV.html] | "Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time '''score capturing''' system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [http://smalltalk.org/smalltalk/TheEarlyHistoryOfSmalltalk_IV.html] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Music]] |
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Computer Programming]] |
Latest revision as of 15:05, June 23, 2016
"Chris Jeffers (who was a musician and educator, not a computer scientist) knocked us out with OPUS, the first real-time score capturing system. Unlike most systems today it did not require metronomic playing but instead took a first pass lookng for string and weak beats (the phrasing) to establish a local model of the likely temp fluctuations and then used curve fitting and extrapolation to make judgements about just where in the measure, and for what time value, a given note had been struck." [1]