Changes

236 bytes removed ,  18:16, October 29, 2012
m
Reverted edits by FranklinW (talk) to last revision by Dvergne
Line 55: Line 55:     
Despite many psychological studies which indicate that the parent-child relationship, early childhood development, early homosexual experiences, and childhood abuse foster homosexuality, liberals tend to reject the environmental aspect, and favor a biological influence.<ref>David G. Myers, ''A level of explanations view'', Psychology of Christianity: four views. pp. 54-83</ref> This is then used to render homosexuals to be slaves to genes, and justified in acting it out.
 
Despite many psychological studies which indicate that the parent-child relationship, early childhood development, early homosexual experiences, and childhood abuse foster homosexuality, liberals tend to reject the environmental aspect, and favor a biological influence.<ref>David G. Myers, ''A level of explanations view'', Psychology of Christianity: four views. pp. 54-83</ref> This is then used to render homosexuals to be slaves to genes, and justified in acting it out.
−
  −
Studies have shown that homosexuality is particularly rampant in vocal anti-homosexuals (see [[Ted Haggard]] and [[Jerry Falwell]]), and even moreso in individuals named Ken or who have the last name De[[M]]yer.<ref> It's logic.</ref>
      
==Environment and nurture==
 
==Environment and nurture==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits