1,660
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Falsifiability Challenge (view source)
Revision as of 23:07, April 12, 2007
, 23:07, April 12, 2007→Uncited Arguments
:: Yep, that about sums up my feelings of the likelihood of success of Philip's arguments.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:51, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:: Yep, that about sums up my feelings of the likelihood of success of Philip's arguments.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:51, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:Could you please specify which claims you want citations for? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:54, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:Could you please specify which claims you want citations for? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:54, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
== Nonsense ==
Unless stated more clearly, the above is entirely nonsense. This page is for falsifiability statements. Make one or don't. The Evo statements are clear examples of falsifiability. I think the misunderstanding here is '''falsification vs falsifiability'''.
[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT)