SkipCaptcha
3,682
edits
Brenden
Joined April 17, 2012
→RE:Block comments
==RE:Block comments==
==RE:Block comments==
I don't see any problem with mocking the liberals who come to this website in order to vandalize it. I know that mocking blocked liberals is also done by some of the best users here (them being the best users is evident by the fact they were promoted to administrators) so I don't see what the problem is. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 00:41, 23 February 2013 (EST)
I don't see any problem with mocking the liberals who come to this website in order to vandalize it. I know that mocking blocked liberals is also done by some of the best users here (them being the best users is evident by the fact they were promoted to administrators) so I don't see what the problem is. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 00:41, 23 February 2013 (EST)
==DonnyC==
The offending edit in question is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=prev&oldid=1036893 this]. This kind of relatively mild snark would get a first time offender a warning only, but Donny is no first time offender. Already before the recent block he managed to incur [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ADonnyC five blocks] for activities such as trolling, rudeness toward others, 90/10 rule violation and spamming. Notice that even DamianJohn (who revoked his recent block) agreed with me one time that Donny's behavior was block worthy (see the blocks Donny received on February 16). The fact that on that day Damian did not revoke Donny's block but merely shortened it suggests that his disagreement with me was not about whether or not Donny's behavior was blockowrthy, but only about the length of the block. In light of his past behavior, the only problem I have with the current block is that it's too short. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 04:02, 27 February 2013 (EST)