Changes

:::::*If you take the phrase for itself, it seems to be counterintuitive. But Jesus has described himself over and over again as "Son of Man/man", and his Jewish listeners would have drawn the conclusion that this is just ''one'' aspect of his person, implying the other aspect, "Son of God". But this is an interpretation - it should not be put into the translation.

:::::*If you take the phrase for itself, it seems to be counterintuitive. But Jesus has described himself over and over again as "Son of Man/man", and his Jewish listeners would have drawn the conclusion that this is just ''one'' aspect of his person, implying the other aspect, "Son of God". But this is an interpretation - it should not be put into the translation.

:::::*m vs. M: you are reaching: the KJV generally uses,e.g. no majuscules for personal pronouns. "Son of Man" is just more polite than "Son of man"

:::::*m vs. M: you are reaching: the KJV generally uses,e.g. no majuscules for personal pronouns. "Son of Man" is just more polite than "Son of man"

:::::*Yes, I ask a lot of questions - [[Talk:E=mc^2|because I get so few answers]].

:::::*Yes, I ask a lot of questions - [[Talk:E=mc²|because I get so few answers]].

:::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:15, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

:::::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:15, 24 June 2014 (EDT)