Difference between revisions of "Archaeoraptor"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Rewrite, source)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Archaeoraptor''' was a hoax [[dinosaur]] created to try and support the [[evolutionist]] argument that [[bird]]s evolved from dinosaurs.{{fact}} It was proven to actually be two different fossils stuck together with [[glue]].
+
'''Archaeoraptor''' was a forged fossil, originally hailed as the missing link between [[dinosaurs]] and [[birds]]. It was created by a Chinese farmer who sought to make extra money by recovering and selling fossils. The farmer glued several fossils together, either out of the belief that they belonged together or a desire to make a more pleasing subject for display. The composite fossil was purchased by a US museum and eventually made their way to National Geographic. There, it was discovered to be a fake, but miscommunication and editorial oversight allowed National Geographic to proceed with an article anyway. While National Geographic published an article on archaeoraptor, several peer-reviewed journals declined. Eventually, the forged nature of the fossil was made public, and National Geographic retracted their claims.<ref>Simmons 2000</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Notes==
 +
<references/>
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
Simons, Louis M. "Archaeoraptor Fossil Trail." ''National Geographic,'' October 2000, http://csip.cornell.edu/Curriculum_Resources/CEIRP/NGArtHlt.html. Accessed April 18, 2007.

Revision as of 20:46, April 18, 2007

Archaeoraptor was a forged fossil, originally hailed as the missing link between dinosaurs and birds. It was created by a Chinese farmer who sought to make extra money by recovering and selling fossils. The farmer glued several fossils together, either out of the belief that they belonged together or a desire to make a more pleasing subject for display. The composite fossil was purchased by a US museum and eventually made their way to National Geographic. There, it was discovered to be a fake, but miscommunication and editorial oversight allowed National Geographic to proceed with an article anyway. While National Geographic published an article on archaeoraptor, several peer-reviewed journals declined. Eventually, the forged nature of the fossil was made public, and National Geographic retracted their claims.[1]

Notes

  1. ↑ Simmons 2000

References

Simons, Louis M. "Archaeoraptor Fossil Trail." National Geographic, October 2000, http://csip.cornell.edu/Curriculum_Resources/CEIRP/NGArtHlt.html. Accessed April 18, 2007.