| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | | | |
| | #A never-ending craving for attention (e.g., [[Hollywood]] types and politicians [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Chuck Schumer]]) | | #A never-ending craving for attention (e.g., [[Hollywood]] types and politicians [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Chuck Schumer]]) |
| − | #A high word-to-substance ratio, as in using many words to say little of substance (e.g., [[Obama]] and the [[90/10 rule]] here) | + | #A high word-to-substance ratio, as in using many words to say little of substance (e.g., [[Obama]] and the [[90/10 rule]] here). They constantly feel the need to add unnecessary vocabulary to the dictionary. |
| | #Interrupt others more frequently than conservatives do, reflecting how liberals rely on [[censorship]] to persuade (as [[Obama]] and [[Biden]] did in the debates) | | #Interrupt others more frequently than conservatives do, reflecting how liberals rely on [[censorship]] to persuade (as [[Obama]] and [[Biden]] did in the debates) |
| | #Obsession with the media, and even with the few [[conservatives]] in the media | | #Obsession with the media, and even with the few [[conservatives]] in the media |
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | #Attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring; bait them into making insensitive remarks; falsely describing them as angry | | #Attempting to portray [[conservatives]] as callous or uncaring; bait them into making insensitive remarks; falsely describing them as angry |
| | #Calling others "extremist" or "racist" | | #Calling others "extremist" or "racist" |
| − | #[[Bully]]ing conservatives who disagree with liberal views | + | #[[Bully]]ing conservatives who disagree with liberal views. This has increase |
| | #Believing that [[conservatives]] will fail, and refusing to accept when they succeed, as when [[George W. Bush]] won in 2000 | | #Believing that [[conservatives]] will fail, and refusing to accept when they succeed, as when [[George W. Bush]] won in 2000 |
| | | | |