Changes

::::I just did a search on the internet to give you better advice. According to the latest research, readers like web articles that are at least between 2,300 to 2,500 words long (or longer) and they want the content to be as much original content as possible (like a unique resource) or not merely cut and paste. So that is a good rule of thumb. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:37, 30 December 2014 (EST)

::::I just did a search on the internet to give you better advice. According to the latest research, readers like web articles that are at least between 2,300 to 2,500 words long (or longer) and they want the content to be as much original content as possible (like a unique resource) or not merely cut and paste. So that is a good rule of thumb. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:37, 30 December 2014 (EST)

:::::Also, Conservapedia does have many [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:LonelyPages&limit=500&offset=0 Orphan pages] so when you create new articles, make sure some existing article or articles, link to the new article.  But the biggest priority is not deorphaning pages, but the creation of new content that is 2,300-2,500 words or more in length in terms of original content. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:59, 30 December 2014 (EST)

:::::Also, Conservapedia does have many [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:LonelyPages&limit=500&offset=0 Orphan pages] so when you create new articles, make sure some existing article or articles, link to the new article.  But the biggest priority is not deorphaning pages, but the creation of new content that is 2,300-2,500 words or more in length in terms of original content. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:59, 30 December 2014 (EST)

I put your [[strategic relocation]] article into this free [http://wordcounttools.com/ web page counter tool] and it said your article is 565 words in length.  So I would make your future articles about 4 to 5 times bigger or more in length in order garner more readership.  

I put your [[strategic relocation]] article into this free [http://wordcounttools.com/ web page word counter tool] and it said your article is 565 words in length.  So I would make your future articles about 4 to 5 times bigger or more in length in order garner more readership.  

Does it make sense that readers prefer more informative articles with unique content over articles which contain content largely copied elsewhere or articles which are stub articles? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:12, 30 December 2014 (EST)

Does it make sense that readers prefer more informative articles with unique content over articles which contain content largely copied elsewhere or articles which are stub articles? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:12, 30 December 2014 (EST)