Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eyespot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-~~~~) |
Hojimachong (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :"Should be" doesn't cut it. I don't remember Andy saying that equal time is the rule. If he did, then he is contradicting the [[User:CPanel|Panel]]. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:09, April 19, 2007
The policy here is or at least should be equal time. Insert counterbalancing claims, but leave the scientific ones.-AmesGyo! 20:06, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
- "Should be" doesn't cut it. I don't remember Andy saying that equal time is the rule. If he did, then he is contradicting the Panel. --Hojimachongtalk 20:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT)