Changes

:*Your ideas, Timppeli, is exactly why it is locked, because they are not accurate.  Moore does not make conventional documentaries, and as such, it is a misnomer to label them that way. I was the one who locked it.  This is not Wikipedia.  We do not engage in "double-speak" or label clearly propagandist efforts as documentaries. What Moore does is mix polemics, propaganda and the documentary styles together.  While clearly he includes factual data, he also extrapolates, adds conjecture that comes from dubious sources, and mixes it with his own rather extreme leftist POV, all without any disclaimers in the credits.--~ [[User:TK|^Sysop-TK]] _{[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]} 19:52, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

:*Your ideas, Timppeli, is exactly why it is locked, because they are not accurate.  Moore does not make conventional documentaries, and as such, it is a misnomer to label them that way. I was the one who locked it.  This is not Wikipedia.  We do not engage in "double-speak" or label clearly propagandist efforts as documentaries. What Moore does is mix polemics, propaganda and the documentary styles together.  While clearly he includes factual data, he also extrapolates, adds conjecture that comes from dubious sources, and mixes it with his own rather extreme leftist POV, all without any disclaimers in the credits.--~ [[User:TK|^Sysop-TK]] _{[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]} 19:52, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

::Has there ever been a political documentary which the other side with difrent opinnions havent claimed to be propagandist? There is allready a critisism section on the article, and thats fine, but to outright label the documents pseudo-documentaryes is not neutral in any way. What by the way are my ideas? i happen to disagree Mr Moore on several things allso. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:59, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

::Has there ever been a political documentary which the other side with difrent opinnions havent claimed to be propagandist? There is allready a critisism section on the article, and thats fine, but to outright label the documents pseudo-documentaryes is not neutral in any way. What by the way are my ideas? i happen to disagree Mr Moore on several things allso. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:59, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

Also, Michael Moore is fat.  This is a central complaint lobbed against him by most of his critics.  It is unfair of the article not to acknowledge this.  Please make mention of how fat Michael Moore is.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 10:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

Also, Michael Moore is fat.  This is a central complaint lobbed against him by most of his critics.  It is unfair of the article not to acknowledge this.  Please make mention of how fat Michael Moore is.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 10:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

:*Hmmmm, maybe your arguments are better suited here: [http://www.afi.com/] I do agree, however, that you have been fairly calm. --~ [[User:TK|^Sysop-TK]] _{[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]} 10:51, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

:*Hmmmm, maybe your arguments are better suited here: [http://www.afi.com/] I do agree, however, that you have been fairly calm. --~ [[User:TK|^Sysop-TK]] _{[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]} 10:51, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

::What do you mean by that?  The AFI considers Moore a documentatian.  Thats what his academy award was for, isnt it?

::What do you mean by that?  The AFI considers Moore a documentatian.  Thats what his academy award was for, isnt it?