Changes

732 bytes added ,  22:26, September 11, 2015
Four Horsement of Progressivism
Line 2: Line 2:     
The ''National Review'' is somewhat [[neoconservative]] in philosophy, though not as neoconservative as the ''[[Weekly Standard]]''.
 
The ''National Review'' is somewhat [[neoconservative]] in philosophy, though not as neoconservative as the ''[[Weekly Standard]]''.
 +
 +
==Four Horsement of Progressivism==
 +
In 2009, National Review ran a series of four articles attempting to highlight the history of progressivism and how it relates to today.<ref>[http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-four-horsemen-of-progressive.html The Four Horsemen Of The Progressive Apocalypse]</ref><ref>[https://crosbyja.wordpress.com/progressives/ Now that’s Progressive!]</ref>  They highlighted [[Richard T. Ely]],<ref>Richard Ely’s Golden Calf</ref> [[John Dewey]],<ref> John Dewey and the Philosophical Refounding of America</ref> [[Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.]],<ref>The Curious Constitution of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.</ref> and [[Herbert Croly]].<ref>Herbert Croly’s American Bismarcks</ref>
    
== See Also ==
 
== See Also ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147

edits