Difference between revisions of "Fallacy of exclusion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (punctuation, copy edit)
(clean up & uniformity)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''fallacy of exclusion''' is a [[logic|logical]] fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence.'"<ref>[http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/exclus.htm Stephen's Guide: Fallacy of Exclusion]</ref>
+
The '''fallacy of exclusion''' is a [[logic]]al fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence.'"<ref>[http://onegoodmove.org/fallacy/exclus.htm Stephen's Guide: Fallacy of Exclusion]</ref>
−
==See Also==
+
==See also==
 
*[[Cherry picking]]
 
*[[Cherry picking]]
 
*[[Half-truth]]
 
*[[Half-truth]]
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
[[Category: Logic]]
+
[[Category:Logic]]
−
[[Category: Logical Fallacies]]
+
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Revision as of 12:20, July 13, 2016

The fallacy of exclusion is a logical fallacy where "Important evidence which would undermine an inductive argument is excluded from consideration. The requirement that all relevant information be included is called the 'principle of total evidence.'"[1]

See also

References