Difference between revisions of "Talk:Geologic system"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Geological column moved to Talk:Geologic system: More neutral name) |
(fooey) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Scratch that; I've decided on a different name altogether. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT) | :Scratch that; I've decided on a different name altogether. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Me too, but due to the Kommandments, I can't print it here. This article is just garbage. Although the hilarious, obligatory YEC (why isn't this called YECapedia?) "perspective" is, I guess, par for the course, where is the ''article''? What do we learn when we read this? Almost nothing. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:21, April 29, 2007
Article name
Any opinions on which is the correct (or better) name?
- Google has 53,900 hits on English pages for "Geologic Column".
- Google has 24,600 hits on English pages for "Geological Column" (the present title).
Philip J. Rayment 05:44, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
- Scratch that; I've decided on a different name altogether. Philip J. Rayment 05:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
- Me too, but due to the Kommandments, I can't print it here. This article is just garbage. Although the hilarious, obligatory YEC (why isn't this called YECapedia?) "perspective" is, I guess, par for the course, where is the article? What do we learn when we read this? Almost nothing. Human 21:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)