Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:  
! Name !! Version Number !! Public Release !! Notes !! Editions !! Minimum [[Random-access memory|RAM]] required !! Minimum [[Hard drive|drive]] space
 
! Name !! Version Number !! Public Release !! Notes !! Editions !! Minimum [[Random-access memory|RAM]] required !! Minimum [[Hard drive|drive]] space
 
|-
 
|-
| Windows 1.0 || 1.04 || April, 1987 ||  ||  || ||
+
| '''Windows 1.0''' || 1.0 || November 20, 1985<ref>http://www.networkworld.com/article/2193906/windows/windows-1-0-turning-25--first-experiences-recalled.html</ref> ||  ||  || ||
 
|-
 
|-
| Windows 2.0 || 2.11 || March 13, 1989 || Last Windows version to run a [[Graphic User Interface|GUI]] as a shell over a base of [[MS-DOS]]<ref name="HowToGeek">http://www.howtogeek.com/132488/does-windows-still-rely-on-ms-dos</ref> ||  || ||
+
| Windows 1.02 || 1.02 || May 1986 || Multilingual (international) release of 1.0 ||  || ||
 +
|-
 +
| Windows 1.03 || 1.03 ||  August 1986 || Further upgrades for international use, including more drivers and European keyboard support ||  || ||
 +
|-
 +
| '''Windows 1.04''' || 1.04 ||  April 1987 || Further functionality additions, including support for IBM PS/2 computers ||  || ||
 +
|-
 +
| '''Windows 2.0''' || 2.11 || March 13, 1989 || Last Windows version to run a [[Graphic User Interface|GUI]] as a shell over a base of [[MS-DOS]]<ref name="HowToGeek">http://www.howtogeek.com/132488/does-windows-still-rely-on-ms-dos</ref> ||  || ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Windows 3.0''' || NT 3.0 ||  May 22, 1990  || First Windows version to run without an [[MS-DOS]] base<ref name="HowToGeek">http://www.howtogeek.com/132488/does-windows-still-rely-on-ms-dos</ref> ||  ||  ||
 
| '''Windows 3.0''' || NT 3.0 ||  May 22, 1990  || First Windows version to run without an [[MS-DOS]] base<ref name="HowToGeek">http://www.howtogeek.com/132488/does-windows-still-rely-on-ms-dos</ref> ||  ||  ||
Line 105: Line 111:  
| ''Windows Server 2003'' || NT 5.2 || 2003 ||  ||  ||  ||
 
| ''Windows Server 2003'' || NT 5.2 || 2003 ||  ||  ||  ||
 
|-
 
|-
| Windows CE Macallan<ref name="ce6.0">https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/mikehall/2006/09/20/ce-6-0-why-the-codename-yamazaki</ref> || CE 5.0 || August 2004<ref name="ce6.0">https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/mikehall/2006/09/20/ce-6-0-why-the-codename-yamazaki</ref> ||  ||  ||  ||
+
| Windows CE Macallan<ref name="ce6.0">https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/mikehall/2006/09/20/ce-6-0-why-the-codename-yamazaki</ref> || CE 5.0 || August 2004<ref name="ce6.0">https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/mikehall/2006/09/20/ce-6-0-why-the-codename-yamazaki</ref> ||  ||  || 6MB<ref>https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms927515.aspx</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ''Windows Server 2003 R2'' ||  || 2006 ||  ||  ||  ||
 
| ''Windows Server 2003 R2'' ||  || 2006 ||  ||  ||  ||
Line 184: Line 190:  
* IoT Core
 
* IoT Core
 
||x32/x86: 1GB,<br /> x64: 2GB<ref>http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-win_upgrade/how-much-ram-will-windows-10-use/769c6a0e-82de-4254-ae65-59a84c6a5886</ref>
 
||x32/x86: 1GB,<br /> x64: 2GB<ref>http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_10-win_upgrade/how-much-ram-will-windows-10-use/769c6a0e-82de-4254-ae65-59a84c6a5886</ref>
  ||
+
  || x32/x86: 16GB,<br /> x64: 20GB<ref>https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-10/2257/windows-10-minimum-hardware-requirements-for-pc</ref><ref>https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn915086%28v=vs.85%29.aspx</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ''Windows Server 2016'' ||  || 2016  ||  || || ||
 
| ''Windows Server 2016'' ||  || 2016  ||  || || ||
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, rollback
19,320

edits

Navigation menu