Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,758
edits
Changes
→Atheism and liberal Christianity alliance related to evolutionism
The problem is that the NCSE is not neutral on atheism vs. religion, but has clearly taken a side in preferring one particularly fuzzy, liberal, soft version of Christianity as its ‘acceptable’ religious belief.<ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/12/05/the-battle-over-ncse/The battle over NCSE]</ref>}}
The problem is that the NCSE is not neutral on atheism vs. religion, but has clearly taken a side in preferring one particularly fuzzy, liberal, soft version of Christianity as its ‘acceptable’ religious belief.<ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/12/05/the-battle-over-ncse/The battle over NCSE]</ref>}}
== American Liberals and Recent Behavior in Accordance with Social Darwinism ==
As noted earlier, liberals are more likely to advocate the evolutionary paradigm than conservatives. Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism."<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html</ref> Professor Brooks found that [[Liberals and uncharitableness|American liberals are significantly less charitable than American conservatives]] despite earning more.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html</ref> American [[Conservatives]] also donate more time and donate more blood. <ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html</ref> The results are not entirely surprising given that Darwinists have historically often displayed behavior in accordance with [[social darwinism]].
==See Also==
==See Also==