555
edits
Changes
Debate:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements? (view source)
Revision as of 21:14, April 25, 2007
, 21:14, April 25, 2007→Yes: 90/10 rule is being used to silence criticism
No Problem. I thought the notion that campus security would visit the student strange, and perhaps, if one wanted to view it this way, it could be considered a form of cyber-bullying.--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 17:32, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
No Problem. I thought the notion that campus security would visit the student strange, and perhaps, if one wanted to view it this way, it could be considered a form of cyber-bullying.--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 17:32, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
:It was fairly clear that [[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] was blocked for questioning accuracy and verifiability. Of course some other excuse was given. I couldn't find it in the rules though. I was threatened with the 90/10 [[rule]] for inquiring about it. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=127442&oldid=127424]
:[[User:Auld Nick|Auld Nick]] 17:14, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
==No==
==No==