Changes

Previous to beginning the translation work of the ''New World Translation'', Jehovah's Witnesses quoted from either the ''[[King James Bible]]'' or the ''[[American Standard Version]]'' in their publications.  Although the ''New World Translation'' has become the primary translation in Jehovah's Witness publications they continue to make use of other translations in their publications.

Previous to beginning the translation work of the ''New World Translation'', Jehovah's Witnesses quoted from either the ''[[King James Bible]]'' or the ''[[American Standard Version]]'' in their publications.  Although the ''New World Translation'' has become the primary translation in Jehovah's Witness publications they continue to make use of other translations in their publications.

In the foreward to 1963 release, the anonymous translation committee stated that their method of translation was with the goal of being as literal as possible to the point of understandableness.  The language is intended to be modern, when compared to the archaic English of the ''King James''.

In the foreword to 1963 release, the anonymous translation committee stated that their method of translation was with the goal of being as literal as possible to the point of understandableness.  The language is intended to be modern, when compared to the archaic English of the ''King James''.

The completed 1963 edition ran 3,646 pages and included thousands of footnotes, cross-references, an appendix that outlined the translators rationale behind specific decisions made in the translation process, and an index of Bible words.  Today the ''New World Translation'' is offered in soft cover editions, including a pocket sized version, or a hard-cover reference version that contains over 125,000 marginal references.

The completed 1963 edition ran 3,646 pages and included thousands of footnotes, cross-references, an appendix that outlined the translators rationale behind specific decisions made in the translation process, and an index of Bible words.  Today the ''New World Translation'' is offered in soft cover editions, including a pocket sized version, or a hard-cover reference version that contains over 125,000 marginal references.

|}

|}

An on-line English version (absent marginal references, appendices, etc) is available at the [http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/index.htm Jehovah's Witnesses Official Web Site].

An on-line English version (absent marginal references, appendices, etc.) is available at the [http://www.watchtower.org/e/bible/index.htm Jehovah's Witnesses Official Web Site].

== Features ==

== Features ==

In addition to the aforementioned appendices and marginal references, ''The New World Translation'' features consistency in translation choices through-out the text.  An example is the Hebrew word ''sheol'' which was translated in the ''King James Version'' 31 times as "hell," 31 times as "grave," and 3 times as "pit".  The ''New world Translation'' uniformly leaves the word untranslated.

In addition to the aforementioned appendices and marginal references, ''The New World Translation'' features consistency in translation choices throughout the text.  An example is the Hebrew word ''sheol'' which was translated in the ''King James Version'' 31 times as "hell," 31 times as "grave," and 3 times as "pit".  The ''New world Translation'' uniformly leaves the word untranslated.

Changes in language from the 17th century English used by the ''King James Version'' and the modern language of the ''The New World Translation'' can be seen in the following examples:

Changes in language from the 17th century English used by the ''King James Version'' and the modern language of the ''The New World Translation'' can be seen in the following examples:

:In supporting their use of the Jehovah, the translators note in Appendix 1D of the Reference edition, that early Christian writers such as Matthew and Peter would have relied on either Hebrew copies of Scriptures then available or the Greek Septuagint.  These sources would have naturally included the Tetragrammaton (הוהי ), although the custom of the day was to use the word Adonai.

:In supporting their use of the Jehovah, the translators note in Appendix 1D of the Reference edition, that early Christian writers such as Matthew and Peter would have relied on either Hebrew copies of Scriptures then available or the Greek Septuagint.  These sources would have naturally included the Tetragrammaton (הוהי ), although the custom of the day was to use the word Adonai.

:They then quote George Howard (University of Georgia) who wrote in ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' (Vol. 96, 1977, p. 63:  “Recent discoveries in Egypt and the Judean Desert allow us to see first hand the use of God’s name in pre-Christian times. These discoveries are significant for N[ew] T[estament] studies in that they form a literary analogy with the earliest Christian documents and may explain how NT authors used the divine name. In the following pages we will set forth a theory that the divine name, הוהי (and possibly abbreviations of it), was originally written in the NT quotations of and allusions to the O[ld] T[estament] and that in the course of time it was replaced mainly with the surrogate [abbreviation for Ky′ri·os, “Lord”]. This removal of the Tetragram[maton], in our view, created a confusion in the minds of early Gentile Christians about the relationship between the ‘Lord God’ and the ‘Lord Christ’ which is reflected in the MS tradition of the NT text itself.”

:They then quote George Howard (University of Georgia) who wrote in ''Journal of Biblical Literature'' (Vol. 96, 1977, p. 63):  “Recent discoveries in Egypt and the Judean Desert allow us to see first hand the use of God’s name in pre-Christian times. These discoveries are significant for N[ew] T[estament] studies in that they form a literary analogy with the earliest Christian documents and may explain how NT authors used the divine name. In the following pages we will set forth a theory that the divine name, הוהי (and possibly abbreviations of it), was originally written in the NT quotations of and allusions to the O[ld] T[estament] and that in the course of time it was replaced mainly with the surrogate [abbreviation for Ky′ri·os, “Lord”]. This removal of the Tetragram[maton], in our view, created a confusion in the minds of early Gentile Christians about the relationship between the ‘Lord God’ and the ‘Lord Christ’ which is reflected in the MS tradition of the NT text itself.”

:'''John 1:1 - "and the Word was a god"''' A proof-text used in support of the [[Trinity]] doctrine, ''The New World Translation'' translates the Greek text in a manner that does not state Jesus Christ (The Word) is God.

:'''John 1:1 - "and the Word was a god"''' A proof-text used in support of the [[Trinity]] doctrine, ''The New World Translation'' translates the Greek text in a manner that does not state Jesus Christ (The Word) is God.