Difference between revisions of "User talk:JoyousOne"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(a note to Mr (or Mrs. or Miss) Joyous) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Jouyous, You're going to have to cool off, buddy. Please read the editing commandments as I've indicated on Scientology's talk page. Follow them and we can all edit on a level playing field, okay? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 00:31, 25 April 2007 (EDT) | Jouyous, You're going to have to cool off, buddy. Please read the editing commandments as I've indicated on Scientology's talk page. Follow them and we can all edit on a level playing field, okay? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 00:31, 25 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello Jouyous One. I have changed or deleted a number of your edits on the Scientology article because they violate Conservapedia guidelines. Why don't we use the discussion page to go over the edits you want to make. The point on Conservapedia is to have truthful articles that are not full of oddball citations and personal pages, and that don't resort to opinion. I'm sure we can come to some agreements on what goes on this article and what does not, based on the guidelines.[[User:Grrrilla|Grrrilla]] | ||
Revision as of 05:29, April 25, 2007
Jouyous, You're going to have to cool off, buddy. Please read the editing commandments as I've indicated on Scientology's talk page. Follow them and we can all edit on a level playing field, okay? Terryeo 00:31, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Hello Jouyous One. I have changed or deleted a number of your edits on the Scientology article because they violate Conservapedia guidelines. Why don't we use the discussion page to go over the edits you want to make. The point on Conservapedia is to have truthful articles that are not full of oddball citations and personal pages, and that don't resort to opinion. I'm sure we can come to some agreements on what goes on this article and what does not, based on the guidelines.Grrrilla