Difference between revisions of "Evolution and science"
m (Tidy up) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→See also: Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
People who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular [[junk science]] are increasingly embracing the [[logic]] of [[creation science]]. | People who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular [[junk science]] are increasingly embracing the [[logic]] of [[creation science]]. | ||
| − | ==See | + | ==See also== |
[[Evolution and creation]] | [[Evolution and creation]] | ||
Revision as of 17:04, October 28, 2016
Evolution and science conflict with each other. Evolution is clearly atheistic[1] and a pseudoscience, easily disproven by numerous counterexamples to evolution that exist. Evolution is not real science because it makes guesses as to what happened in the past, which cannot be observed and is not repeatable, while real, observational science can be observed through repeatable tests. While creation science is similar to this, the evidence, including in science, in history, and in divine revelation, points to something other than evolution and long ages.
Creationists also disagree with evolution as it requires a time frame of billion/millions of years. This is incompatible with their time frame for creation of approximately 6000 years, as derived from the Bible.
People who can distinguish real science from atheistic secular junk science are increasingly embracing the logic of creation science.