Difference between revisions of "Textual"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{discrimlaw}}'''Textualism''' is the idea that the meaning of the Constitution can be inferred from the plain meaning of the words themselves. Where the words are lacking to support a constitutional argument, | + | {{discrimlaw}}'''Textualism''' is the idea that the meaning of the Constitution can be inferred from the plain meaning of the words themselves. Where the words are lacking to support a constitutional argument, the constitutional basis is thereby lacking, too. [[Antonin Scalia]] is a prominent textualist, and is known for advocating a reading of constitutional text through the lens that provided the framework for the mindset of the framers. |
Revision as of 16:05, April 26, 2007
| Part of the series on |
| U.S. Discrimination Law |
| Standards of Review |
| Other Legal Theories |
| Defining Moments in Law |
|
The 14th Amendment |
| Modalities of Constitutional Law |
Textualism is the idea that the meaning of the Constitution can be inferred from the plain meaning of the words themselves. Where the words are lacking to support a constitutional argument, the constitutional basis is thereby lacking, too. Antonin Scalia is a prominent textualist, and is known for advocating a reading of constitutional text through the lens that provided the framework for the mindset of the framers.