Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,219
edits
Changes
mLine 1:
Line 1: − B0LL0CKS+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Reverted edits by AndyYourMumIsRotting (talk) to last revision by Fnarrow
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
Impeccable? Do you mean infallible? [[User:Kolbe|Kolbe]] 04:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
Please include a reference or link for Dictatus Papae. Thanks! [[user:Maryanntherese|Maryanntherese]] 07:49, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
:This article is a disgrace! It should go into the nature and history of the papacy before presuming to pass judgement on it. And it should bear in mind that far more Christians world-wide are Roman Catholic than are Protestant fundamentalists! Any volunteers? --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 06:29, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
At the risk of mentioning the unmentionable, Wikipedia has an excellent page on Papal Infallibility [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility]. Conservapedia could do much worse than import it wholesale! [[User:Stallthedigger|stallthedigger]] 11:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:While technically, we could indeed do ''worse'', breach of copyright is bad enough. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:05, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::I was under the impression that Wikipedia was open source, hence no copyright issue?
Too much negative critics.
--[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 10:53, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
There's absolutely nothing wrong with anyone here writing their own version of papal infallibility, or any other article in this website. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 07:27, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
:This is truth, but articles should be neutral. Not a collection of negative arguments. For that last thing there is a talk page.
:--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 07:46, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
: Ok i am gonna fix this thing up.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 12:01, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
:I'm Catholic, but I have to say that the new Pope doesn't photograph very well. He always comes off reminding me of the Emperor from Star Wars.[[User:Jnl001|Jnl001]] 12:04, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
Ya same. [[John Paul II]] photographed great! Ya this Pope I have to agree does not photograph well.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 12:16, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
Are anti-popes on the list because I don't think they should be added. --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 10:16, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
== Concerning the Tiara ==
I was under the impression that the papacy has abandoned the tiara as it historically symbolized the Pope's position as a secular political ruler alongside all his other duties, and such a notion has, if not officially then in practice, been abandoned for quite some time...?[[User:Jros83|Jros83]] 22:26, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
== Not everyone is a catholic ==
Most if not all protestants would dispute a lot of the claims made by the first paragraph. maybe there should be something like "according to catholic doctrine" or something. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 19:35, 17 January 2008 (EST)
==Credits==
::{{template|Part of this article was copied from [[Citizendium]] and [[Wikipedia]] but the copied text was originally written by me, RJJensen (under the name Richard Jensen and rjensen) and does not include alterations made by others on that site.||category=Copied Articles}} [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 04:35, 29 January 2009 (EST)
I would recommend going to the Vaticans news site for info on the Catholic Church.
== Badly Needed Updates ==
I'm not Catholic, so I probably would not be the best person to do it but I noticed that this and other pages relating to the papacy are badly out of date. At the very least I think this page should contain the proper biographical information for the current Pope. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 17:27, 6 April 2013 (EDT)