Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanH"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Page Delete Request)
(Replacing page with '<p align="center"><b><span style="font-size:36pt">Icewedge has pwned {{PAGENAME}}</span></b></p>')
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Archive:''' http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:MountainDew
+
<p align="center"><b><span style="font-size:36pt">Icewedge has pwned {{PAGENAME}}</span></b></p>
−
==Much Better==
 
−
Nice suit, fits real good. Do you like mine?[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>
 
−
 
 
−
==?==
 
−
 
 
−
Cut what out exactly?
 
−
 
 
−
:I didn't add any of the names...I simply tidied up the page, like the table. [[User:Wattylfc|Wattylfc]] 15:37, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Big edits==
 
−
Thanks for the tip. Why the name change, MountainDew? [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 17:54, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
::I see... I don't think your old discussion page redirects to your new one. Might want to put a redirect in there too so people don't get confused. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 17:56, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Thanks!==
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks for blocking Iamwhoiam.  I hate having to sit here and revert all that nonsense when I can be contributing to articles!  --[[User:Thammersmith|Thammersmith]] 15:19, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACrocoite&diff=132272&oldid=132268 Thanks for the revert!] [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] <sup>[[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]]</sup> 18:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Main Page ==
 
−
i did not write the comment on encyclopediac standards.  I deleted the f word in the comment and you banned the user.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 01:16, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
--------------
 
−
I took a screen shot of those ban messages lol. I shall post them under the heading "Look what conservapeida bans you for". Indeed. I shall never run our of IPs dude so why ban me?
 
−
-----
 
−
will you not ban me if i just stay on talk pages?
 
−
 
 
−
Oh well ban me if you want i need to get a good night sleep school tomorow.
 
−
 
 
−
Have a nice night (or day depending on your geologial position)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
== Lazarus ==
 
−
 
 
−
The new article [[Lazarus (Parable)]] is ready. But I am not able to make the disambig to ([[Lazarus]]).
 
−
 
 
−
Could you please do it?
 
−
 
 
−
--[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 16:21, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
:Thank you!
 
−
 
 
−
::--[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 16:54, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Good luck ==
 
−
 
 
−
with that paper. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 23:58, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==vandals==
 
−
 
 
−
Here's my question - some people are creating articles that have offensive titles, but benign content.  In these situations, I can delete the content, but the offensive title still exists on a site.  I know the Sysops can delete these entirely, but is there anything I can do to erase that material?  All I know to do is alert Sysops of the problem, but if nobody is available to delete it immediately, the articles can sit on the site and look bad for the site.  Any ideas?  --[[User:Thammersmith|Thammersmith]] 13:27, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Please vote for me ==
 
−
 
 
−
Please vote for me here:  http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Request_for_Bureaucratship  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:10, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Eagle... ==
 
−
 
 
−
I was too slack to make Eagle (it doesn't help if one is not a US citizen)... but does that make me a Scout for Life? [[User:Human|Human]] 02:39, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Question==
 
−
Question for you on the [[Conservapedia_talk:Request_for_Bureaucratship]] page. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:35, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:Nevermind ... saw your reason. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:37, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Grandpa!==
 
−
Nananana Batman!
 
−
 
 
−
* 14:43, 24 April 2007 DanH (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Cherry-picking" (too much speculation)
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks, MountainDew. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Quick catch there of "Andrew Nissian"!  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Hey Dan==
 
−
I just wanted to ask why the Ted Stevens got reverted out of the "internet" article. The series of tubes statement is getting passed around a lot and I think people need to know where it came from.1
 
−
 
 
−
==New Age==
 
−
What was wrong with my edits to [[New Age]] that they had to be reverted?  I didn't use the {stub} template on that one. [[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 13:38, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
== Budapest ==
 
−
I understood.--[[User:Kádár Tamás|Kádár Tamás]] 19:12, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Beaver ? ==
 
−
 
 
−
''"Jeremiah, after seeing your edits to Biscuit and Beaver, I don't know why I haven't blocked you yet."''
 
−
 
 
−
I really don't know what you're talking about here; my [[Beaver]] article is '''entirely factual'''.
 
−
 
 
−
Lots of animals are classified as fish by the Catholic Church for Lenten dietary purposes; I thought that was an interesting beaver-related fact. I will get you a citation for it... Here [http://anvil.unl.edu/agnes/RecreatingLent.htm]
 
−
 
 
−
Had I wished to create a properly satirical article about ''Beavers'' it would surely have been rather different, just run the implications of the word through your mind...
 
−
 
 
−
(My biscuit article was entirely factual too, that sort of thing really does go on - again I can get you a reference if you like.) If you considered the material to be irrelevent or inappropriate, you were free to remove it. Defining it as vandalism (and blocking me for it) was a most unfair and disproportionate reaction in my opinion.
 
−
 
 
−
You've blocked me unjustly once, and now you're persecuting me about the content of a completely authentic article. Please stop doing this. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 20:27, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Just wondering==
 
−
 
 
−
What could I do to gain your trust? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:31, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
Well, I can't say I agree with your assessment of the "edit war" at Fargo. The source was eventually added, btw, so I think I was right. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 09:34, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== NAMBLA ==
 
−
 
 
−
I certainly don't advocate for NAMBLA or the inclusion of the link, but for the sake of knowledge, NAMBLA has never explicitly supported man-boy love; they promote the legalization of such activity. Sick perverts... --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:37, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Mammon ==
 
−
 
 
−
I need an expert.  I found this article, and it was a hostile rant, but not without some truth.  I changed it to create a structure, but I don't know enough about the topic to feel comfortable adding a  lot of content.  Could you or someone else with knowledge help out?--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 20:36, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
==[[User:JeffersonDarcy]]==
 
−
I endorse the block on JeffersonDarcy; I was going to do it myslelf and with a 12 hour block using [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:CPAdmin1/Proposed_Block_Policy#Edit_Warring Edit Warring] as a Guideline.  He can't say he wasn't warned, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Abuse&diff=prev&oldid=131570] and I want to make a record I support it.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:06, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
:I screwed up, as a guideline this reads [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:CPAdmin1/Proposed_Block_Policy#Between_A_Sysop_and_a_non_Sysop 3 hours to one week] after the warning.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Vandal ==
 
−
No problem.  Thanks for blocking him.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 15:45, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:Any idea on how to tag this guy, Dan? I blocked some of his IP's I found via Traceroute, but he's still coming back. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:48, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Polap Srewdna ==
 
−
 
 
−
he didn't edit, why the block?
 
−
 
 
−
== You can talk to me directly==
 
−
 
 
−
Mate, I an't hiding anything feel free to ask me anything, anytime. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:16, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
Take another look at my contributions the past few days since the reversal of my block. Take a look at what icewedge has contributed to the site in the last few days. Then ask whether a post by icewedge with a vague cryptic remark on my wikipedia talk page tips the scales relative to my contributions to put me under investigation. If you are curious about why I post that message on various talk pages, feel free to ask me directly. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:21, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
No harm, no foul. I am only pressing this point because I am a member of this community, there is WAY to much of this SYSOPS vs. Editors war floating around. Lets work towards breaking down that wall. We are both humanbeings, whatever usergroup we are in shouldn't force use to talk past or around each other.
 
−
 
 
−
As to why I post that message, take a look at the users I post it too. They are not vandals, they are not people that are bad. They are people that have a political, scientific, and cultural view much like my own. They also share a common interest in wiki editing and have decided to try conservapedia out. Much like myself. This is a group of people with a lot in common. We like to talk to each other about a range of things. Its off-topic to CP and doesn't belong here. So when I see someone that I think would be interested in our group I invite them to contact me and we talk about it. Nothing nefarious there. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 18:26, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:Toulouse would've told me if there was a conspiracy.  I feel left out of there is one that he's hiding from me.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 20:04, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I was too quick to judge and I apologize again for it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 20:05, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Page Delete Request ==
 
−
 
 
−
Could you please delete a page for me. I'm an idiot and was working while watching tv. I accidentally mistyped the page I wanted as "Deviance Behaviour" instead of "Deviant Behaviour". I can't figure out how to undo it, so it must mean I can't. Thanks --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 00:01, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 16:06, April 28, 2007

Icewedge has pwned DanH

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DanH&oldid=133335"