Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + +
→Politics of global warming: critique of global warming was rejected without review as being of no interest to the readership
Several prominent scientists have pointed out the [[politicized science]] of the UN's assessment methods. The scientific reports are submitted to a panel of representatives appointed by each country in the IPCC. Several scientists have complained about their work being misrepresented by the U.N.
Several prominent scientists have pointed out the [[politicized science]] of the UN's assessment methods. The scientific reports are submitted to a panel of representatives appointed by each country in the IPCC. Several scientists have complained about their work being misrepresented by the U.N.
Even major peer-reviewed journals have engaged in [[policitized science]]:
:"In the spring of 1989 I prepared a critique of global warming, which I submitted to ''Science'', a magazine of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The paper was rejected without review as being of no interest to the readership." [http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html]
==Notes==
==Notes==
<references/>
<references/>