Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 356:
Line 356: +
→New pages from WP
:::::::Using someone's words or ideas without giving them credit is plagiarism. You did slightly reword sections, but at least some of them are almost direct copies. That goes far beyond using it as a resource (which I wouldn't advice anyway, since wikis are not the best source to cite in academic writing anyway) and at the very least the concepts were used without attribution. Please only contribute original wording, with citations to all credible sources which contributed to your writing. Thank you.
:::::::Using someone's words or ideas without giving them credit is plagiarism. You did slightly reword sections, but at least some of them are almost direct copies. That goes far beyond using it as a resource (which I wouldn't advice anyway, since wikis are not the best source to cite in academic writing anyway) and at the very least the concepts were used without attribution. Please only contribute original wording, with citations to all credible sources which contributed to your writing. Thank you.
:::::::As SamHB said, people tend to watch each other--that's how crowd-sourcing (or "[[Best of the Public]]") works. 1990'sguy often checks what I write, and corrects any issues he sees. I appreciate that, because before he joined, I would sometimes find issues (sometimes fairly serious ones) as I reviewed my work months later (although SamHB did help some). When others review what you have posted, it helps ensure the quality of that material. When copyediting, it's not nice to be a pest, disrespect the writer's work, etc., but it is beneficial if they make helpful improvements. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:12, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::::As SamHB said, people tend to watch each other--that's how crowd-sourcing (or "[[Best of the Public]]") works. 1990'sguy often checks what I write, and corrects any issues he sees. I appreciate that, because before he joined, I would sometimes find issues (sometimes fairly serious ones) as I reviewed my work months later (although SamHB did help some). When others review what you have posted, it helps ensure the quality of that material. When copyediting, it's not nice to be a pest, disrespect the writer's work, etc., but it is beneficial if they make helpful improvements. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:12, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
::::::::Yes, and JDano, even though Andy has given me explicit permission to block you, I have chosen not to do so. I am giving you yet another chance to become a more agreeable editor. However, you are continuing the same behaviors -- adding extremely problematic content, ceaseless reverting rather than discussing on the talk page, not even giving a defense of your edits when reverting but using vague statements such as "noteworthy" or etc., and making personal attacks on the editors who oppose your edits rather than going into substance. Your behavior is not helping you ''at all.'' --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:00, 25 July 2017 (EDT)