Difference between revisions of "Generalization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(creating page) |
m (→See also: adding alternative name) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
| − | *[[Fallacy of unwarranted extrapolation]] | + | *[[Fallacy of unwarranted extrapolation]] ([[aka]] Overgeneralization) |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 17:40, September 27, 2017
Generalization, such as generalizing from a sample to a population, is one type of inductive argument.[1]
Strong vs. Weak Generalization
Logicians sometimes describe inductive generalizations on a continuum from strong to weak:
- A strong, or universal, generalization is one that is true of all members of a class, such as the statement "All humans are mammals."
- A weak, or particular, generalization is one that is true of certain members of class.
See also
- Fallacy of unwarranted extrapolation (aka Overgeneralization)
References
- ↑ Henry A. Virkler (2005). "6", A Christian's Guide to Critical Thinking. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 180. ISBN 1-59752-661-4.