Changes

:Your argument makes sense.  I would add to that the fact that there is a difference between macroevolution and microevolution. There is empirical evidence that microevolution takes place--this is obvious. Everything is designed to adapt to its environment, but this is within the confines of its species. (i.e. Darwin's finches adapt their beak lengths, but they never loose their beaks.)  I dislike the usage of the term "evolution" in reference to Darwinism because it lumps both real and fake evolution together in an attempt to make the fake more credible. Starting a war over verbiage (i.e. "you mean macroevolution not evolution, right?") is not going to help the ignorant, so using a term like Darwinism or at the very least evolution'''ism''' is probably the best option. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 14:36, 12 October 2017 (EDT)

:Your argument makes sense.  I would add to that the fact that there is a difference between macroevolution and microevolution. There is empirical evidence that microevolution takes place--this is obvious. Everything is designed to adapt to its environment, but this is within the confines of its species. (i.e. Darwin's finches adapt their beak lengths, but they never loose their beaks.)  I dislike the usage of the term "evolution" in reference to Darwinism because it lumps both real and fake evolution together in an attempt to make the fake more credible. Starting a war over verbiage (i.e. "you mean macroevolution not evolution, right?") is not going to help the ignorant, so using a term like Darwinism or at the very least evolution'''ism''' is probably the best option. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 14:36, 12 October 2017 (EDT)