Difference between revisions of "Challenge for cause"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
For example, a potential juror in a murder case, where the death penalty is being sought, states that she cannot ever vote for the death penalty for religious reasons. In such a case, both attorneys (and often, the judge) will question the potential juror to determine if that is the case. | For example, a potential juror in a murder case, where the death penalty is being sought, states that she cannot ever vote for the death penalty for religious reasons. In such a case, both attorneys (and often, the judge) will question the potential juror to determine if that is the case. | ||
| − | If so, the challenge is granted. It is not counted against the number of [[peremptory challenge]]s that one side or the other are granted. | + | If so, the challenge is granted. It is not counted against the number of [[peremptory challenge]]s that one side or the other are granted, and there are no limits to the number of challenges for cause. |
[[Category:Legal Terms]] | [[Category:Legal Terms]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:28, November 9, 2020
A challenge for cause is a request from a party to a judge that a certain prospective juror not be allowed to be a member of a jury because of specified causes or reasons.
For example, a potential juror in a murder case, where the death penalty is being sought, states that she cannot ever vote for the death penalty for religious reasons. In such a case, both attorneys (and often, the judge) will question the potential juror to determine if that is the case.
If so, the challenge is granted. It is not counted against the number of peremptory challenges that one side or the other are granted, and there are no limits to the number of challenges for cause.