nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
→Table: No objection
Nice job, I like it. Can there be consensus on whether a fourth column can be added labelled "uniformitarian system dates" or something like that? [[User:Human|Human]] 13:39, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
Nice job, I like it. Can there be consensus on whether a fourth column can be added labelled "uniformitarian system dates" or something like that? [[User:Human|Human]] 13:39, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:I have no objection to such a column; I've always had in mind that it would probably be there eventually. Just so long as it is clear that the dates are according to uniformitarian dating (as you indicated). For the sake of space, that qualification would probably not be in the column heading, though. What I was wondering was whether the systems should be broken down even more, but my thinking is to keep it simple by just showing the eras, periods, and epochs. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:44, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
== Cenozoic/cainozoic ==
== Cenozoic/cainozoic ==