Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prokaryote"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(moved discussion here)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Redirected [[Prokaryotes]] and [[Prokaryotic cell]] here. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 19:43, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
I think some of this is slightly outdated.  Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own.  And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. [[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] 11:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I think some of this is slightly outdated.  Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own.  And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. [[User:Aloysius|Aloysius]] 11:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
  
 
It has been many years since I had any microbiology so feel free to update it.  I can work on the molecular side.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 13:59, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
 
It has been many years since I had any microbiology so feel free to update it.  I can work on the molecular side.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 13:59, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:43, May 4, 2007

Redirected Prokaryotes and Prokaryotic cell here. GodlessLiberal 19:43, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

I think some of this is slightly outdated. Archaea are not now regarded as prokaryotes but as a separate domain on their own. And cyanobacteria are classed as archaea, not prokaryotes. Aloysius 11:36, 4 May 2007 (EDT)

It has been many years since I had any microbiology so feel free to update it. I can work on the molecular side.--TimS 13:59, 4 May 2007 (EDT)