As a general rule, the weaker the democratic control over judges, the more [[liberal]] they are in their rulings. For example, the [[Massachusetts]] judges who ordered the granting of [[same-sex marriage]] licenses were not elected and do not face reelection. The [[New Mexico]] judges who interpreted its state [[Equal Rights Amendment]] as requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] were initially appointed, in contrast with the elected [[Pennsylvania]] judges who ruled that its state [[Equal Rights Amendment]] does not require taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]. | As a general rule, the weaker the democratic control over judges, the more [[liberal]] they are in their rulings. For example, the [[Massachusetts]] judges who ordered the granting of [[same-sex marriage]] licenses were not elected and do not face reelection. The [[New Mexico]] judges who interpreted its state [[Equal Rights Amendment]] as requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] were initially appointed, in contrast with the elected [[Pennsylvania]] judges who ruled that its state [[Equal Rights Amendment]] does not require taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]. |