Changes

Butfoy (2006) argues that in the 1990s the "revolution in military affairs" (RMA), which produced "smart" weapons like cruise missiles, came of age. This apparently transformed how America viewed the relationship between force and international relations. It looked as though technology was framing foreign policy. In particular, smart weapons enabled Clinton to combine risk minimization with an expanded security agenda. However, we should be wary of ascribing technological determinism to the conflicts of the 1990s dominated by Washington's flexing of its strategic superiority, such as its bombing of Belgrade. As shown by comparison with US strategy after the  September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Washington's stance in the 1990s was shaped by linkages between technology and specific political circumstances. As these circumstances changed, so did the RMA's place in US efforts to shape world order.

Butfoy (2006) argues that in the 1990s the "revolution in military affairs" (RMA), which produced "smart" weapons like cruise missiles, came of age. This apparently transformed how America viewed the relationship between force and international relations. It looked as though technology was framing foreign policy. In particular, smart weapons enabled Clinton to combine risk minimization with an expanded security agenda. However, we should be wary of ascribing technological determinism to the conflicts of the 1990s dominated by Washington's flexing of its strategic superiority, such as its bombing of Belgrade. As shown by comparison with US strategy after the  September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Washington's stance in the 1990s was shaped by linkages between technology and specific political circumstances. As these circumstances changed, so did the RMA's place in US efforts to shape world order.

During his first term as president, Clinton likely deceived the public into believing that [[Serbia]] was committing genocide in [[Bosnia]].<ref>http://www.wnd.com/2007/05/41373/</ref> Later on, he also lied that Serbia was committing genocide in Kosovo.<ref>http://nobsblog.blogspot.com/1999/01/clinton-wag-dog-no-kosovo-genocide.html</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/aug/18/balkans3</ref> The Clinton State Department claimed that 100,000 Kosovo Albanians were killed or missing, when the causalities was actually 11,000,<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/11/world/early-count-hints-at-fewer-kosovo-deaths.html</ref> and later 3,000.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/aug/18/balkans3</ref>

During his first term as president, Clinton likely deceived the public into believing that [[Serbia]] was committing genocide in [[Bosnia]].<ref>http://www.wnd.com/2007/05/41373/</ref> Later on, he also lied that Serbia was committing genocide in Kosovo,<ref>http://nobsblog.blogspot.com/1999/01/clinton-wag-dog-no-kosovo-genocide.html</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/aug/18/balkans3</ref>, even though he once admitted that the Kosovo Liberation Armyis a terrorist organization<ref>https://apjjf.org/site/make_pdf/3578</ref><ref>https://www.newenglishreview.org/Ares_Demertzis/How_To_Dismember_A_Country/</ref> The Clinton State Department claimed that 100,000 Kosovo Albanians were killed or missing, when the causalities was actually 11,000,<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/11/world/early-count-hints-at-fewer-kosovo-deaths.html</ref> and later 3,000.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/aug/18/balkans3</ref>

===Gives North Korea the nuclear bomb===

===Gives North Korea the nuclear bomb===